tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post111477393931538444..comments2024-03-27T23:59:49.801+00:00Comments on Stoat: EGU: fridayWilliam M. Connolleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131468367528536772005-11-08T16:46:00.000+00:002005-11-08T16:46:00.000+00:00and I didn't see anyone with a sensitivity below 1...<I>and I didn't see anyone with a sensitivity below 1.5 oC (and the author of that noted that it was probably low). </I><BR/><BR/>Was that a transient or an equilibrium sensitivity, and if the latter, what was the 90% equilibrium time?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1114891008988965912005-04-30T19:56:00.000+00:002005-04-30T19:56:00.000+00:00Not that I heard, probably because the paper only ...Not that I heard, probably because the paper only came out on the thursday/friday. I talked to Gavin Schmidt, one of the authors, but... err... well, I didn't press him on the details (I'm assuming I'll get to read it in the paper version next week) and I'm already familiar with the general idea, which is scientifically uncontroversial, so I sort-of wasn't terribly interested.William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1114837293648222072005-04-30T05:01:00.000+00:002005-04-30T05:01:00.000+00:00were there any comments on the new hansen paper sh...were there any comments on the <BR/>new hansen paper showing an<BR/>energy imbalance of 0.85W/sq.m. ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com