tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post113104972132333550..comments2024-03-18T18:14:34.278+00:00Comments on Stoat: How (coupled AO) GCMs workWilliam M. Connolleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131761261070794902005-11-12T02:07:00.000+00:002005-11-12T02:07:00.000+00:00OK, how do GCMs handle the transfer of momentum fr...OK, how do GCMs handle the transfer of momentum from the spinning earth to the atmosphere. Does the absence of vertical structure in the models (mountains, et al.) make a difference.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131575242042311772005-11-09T22:27:00.000+00:002005-11-09T22:27:00.000+00:00check the URL in the bottom of the email you get s...check the URL in the bottom of the email you get sent...James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131529260415174852005-11-09T09:41:00.000+00:002005-11-09T09:41:00.000+00:00CIP - Hmmmm (digression: when people post here, I ...CIP - Hmmmm (digression: when people post here, I get an email, but due to Blogspots stupidity is *doesn't tell me which post the comment is about* so I have to guess which. For yours, I didn't guess either, but the first was particularly opaque... I'm glad you expanded!).<BR/><BR/>Sci Am... tempting, but. As you can see, I dont have the depths of knowledge required for some bits, e.g. the ocean. I could try to rope some others in but then it gets complex. It probably won't happen :-(<BR/><BR/>Crandles - thanks for that thread, I will rip some of it off. Does CP.net really include the sulphur cycle?!?William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131496585798587112005-11-09T00:36:00.000+00:002005-11-09T00:36:00.000+00:00OK, a few more: This subject really could use the...OK, a few more: This subject really could use the Sci Am treatment. It's important, topical, and just the kind of thing to benefit from lavish graphic explanations. Why not sound them out?CapitalistImperialistPighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17523405806602731435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131496442087272212005-11-09T00:34:00.000+00:002005-11-09T00:34:00.000+00:00Two words for you: "Scientific American"Two words for you: "Scientific American"CapitalistImperialistPighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17523405806602731435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7612793.post-1131328012102966062005-11-07T01:46:00.000+00:002005-11-07T01:46:00.000+00:00For a given resolution, it is often actually best ...For a given resolution, it is often actually best to have the time step as <I>large</I> as possible so the CFL criterion is close to 1 - this gives less numerical diffusion (depending on the details of the scheme, probably).<BR/><BR/>Maybe you should mention how the slab oceans work too?James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.com