We're back to the olde feldes with Supreme Court preserves access to abortion pill at which all right-thinking people shout hurrah! Although one senses that the Graun isn't fully comfortable, or even cognisant, of what happened. The issue is one of Standing: just because you happen to care deeply and passionately about a given issue doesn't give you a right to stick your twitchy nose and grimy fingers into the legal pie. Which I link to my previous advice to care less.
This is a legal principle1. But elevated - carefully - to a constitutional provision in some suitable fashion I would tout it as a solution to the Great War: in the sense that the govt really has no cause to be making laws about things that are best left to individuals. I've said this before to the inevitable great acclaim.
Refs
* Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight / Where ignorant armies clash by night.
* The Supreme Court Inches Towards Liberty - Richard Hanania.
* Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18th.
* Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson.
Notes
1. For an opposing view, see The Case Against Restrictive Constitutional Standing Requirements; and for discussion of standing, see many comments on Murthy.
1 comment:
Great acclaim? I guess this is my cue to write 'huzzah!'
Huzzah!
Post a Comment