Update: the result
Refs
* Elon Musk's Story Highlights Harm Caused by Immigration Restrictions.
* Mission unaccomplished: The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision. A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it. Or, the govt as bandits (my take). But on the scale of USAnian politics, just a ripple; the AIM market even rose a little.
* El Econo explains why they (unlike WaPo) do endorse candidates. Their reasoning is somewhat obscure; in their words "To give opinions on policies but not politicians would be odd".
* Noah Smith is sad that "Trumpism systematically appoints the worst people to positions of power, since it prizes *loyalty to a personality cult* above competence and principle". But he doesn't really explain why it is a personality cult. Part is easy: thinking about policy is hard, supporting or hating people is easy. But the hard part - that he doesn't really want to talk about - is the people that see <someone, anyone, oh very well Trump> as a bulwark against the woke-that-is-evil.
* Living in a Post-truth World - Peter Woit.
* Conservatism in Crisis: Rise of the Bureaucratic Class; Kemi Badenoch.
* Johnny Cash - God's Gonna Cut You Down (h/t).
* Just one of many bad takes: Welcome to the American petrostate, Michael E. Mann. Or None of this is meant to imply that most progressive causes are mistaken... in the Graun. Stefan Rahmstorf: it's all the fault of the right wing meeja.
* A collection of great hang-wringing: Trump Didn't Deserve to Win, But We Deserved to Lose.
* PG: Socialists... cherish the idea that the game is rigged so much that they'd rather talk about that than about how to improve their situation.
* The Graun flounces out: Why the Guardian is no longer posting on X.
* Sam Harris on why critique of the media and the establishment must not turn into nihilism, though I now rather regret linking because of his use of "coronated".
* Dear Journalists: Stop Trying to Save Democracy.
* Economath Fails the Cost-Benefit Test.
Notes
1. "Cut the applause and dim the light".
2. Although it is arguably in the spirit of the framer's intent, I find it... well, not amusing, but whatevs... that a better candidate than either on offer can be constructed by simply offering to do nothing. I should probably also point out that I've paid very little attention to anything she has said.
3. Or ACX Endorses Harris, Oliver, Or Stein. But that brings in some problems: it reminds me that Trump, if he won, would have had his two terms and not be up for re-election (if you doubt that you need to explicitly argue against it). And it also asserts that Repubs are typically-Trump, which I doubt.